Transfer Pricing in 2026: The Hidden Risk in Your Global Transactions

Why transfer pricing is no longer just a big-company problem

There was a time when transfer pricing was a concern only for the top 500 Indian corporates — the Tatas, the Infosyses, the subsidiaries of Fortune 500 multinationals.

That time is over. Today:

• A mid-sized IT services company in Chennai billing its Singapore holding company
• A Pune-based manufacturer selling components to its German parent
• A Bengaluru startup paying royalties to its Delaware IP holding entity

All of them are squarely within India's transfer pricing regime — and most are not adequately prepared.

The scale of the shift

• ₹40,000+ crores collected in TP adjustments in a recent cycle
• Increasing TP litigation across courts and tribunals
• OECD BEPS framework embedded into Indian law
• Access to CbCR, Master File, and Local File data

Tax authorities today have unprecedented visibility into how profits are allocated globally.

If your business has related-party transactions — international or even domestic — this matters to you.

What is transfer pricing?

When unrelated parties transact, prices are determined by market forces.

When related parties transact, prices can be manipulated, affecting:

• Profit allocation
• Tax jurisdiction
• Overall tax liability

Transfer pricing rules ensure that related-party transactions occur at arm's length — as if between independent entities.

Risk of non-compliance

If prices deviate:

• Income is adjusted upward
• Additional tax is levied
• Interest and penalties apply
• The case may be referred for TP audit

The Indian transfer pricing framework

Legal backbone

Sections 92 to 92F of the Income Tax Act cover:

• International transactions
• Specified domestic transactions
• Deemed international transactions

Associated Enterprises (AE)

Entities are considered related if there is:

• 26% or more shareholding
• Management or control overlap
• Significant loan financing
• Other prescribed relationships

Accepted methods

• CUP (Comparable Uncontrolled Price)
• RPM (Resale Price Method)
• CPM (Cost Plus Method)
• PSM (Profit Split Method)
• TNMM (Transactional Net Margin Method)

TNMM dominates in India, especially for IT and ITES.

What has changed (2024–2026)

1. BEPS is now enforced reality

Country-by-Country Reporting (CbCR). Applicable for groups with revenue above ₹5,500 crores. It provides jurisdiction-wise:

• Revenue
• Profit
• Tax paid
• Employees
• Assets

Master File and Local File.

• Master File: global structure, value chain
• Local File: entity-level transaction analysis

Principal Purpose Test (PPT). Treaty benefits are denied if tax avoidance is a primary purpose.

Multilateral Instrument (MLI). Treaties are updated without renegotiation, so existing structures may be reinterpreted.

2. Safe harbour rules (updated)

Predefined margins for:

• IT / ITES: 17%–24%
• KPO: 24%
• Contract R&D: 24%
• Loans and guarantees: prescribed spreads

Many businesses cannot sustain these margins, forcing full benchmarking.

3. Domestic transfer pricing

Applies if transactions exceed ₹20 crores, including:

• Related-party payments
• SEZ-linked transactions
• Tax-incentive-based structures

The five most litigated TP areas

1. IT and software services

• Classification as captive or low-risk entities
• Authorities often push for higher margins

2. Royalties and intangibles

• DEMPE framework focus
• Substance over legal ownership

3. Management fees

• Were the services actually rendered?
• Is the allocation justified?

4. Intra-group financing

• Interest rates
• Guarantee fees
• Cash pooling structures

5. Business restructuring

• Exit charges
• Transfer of profit potential

Advance Pricing Agreements (APA)

What is an APA?

A binding agreement with tax authorities on:

• Pricing methodology
• Arm's length pricing

Key benefits

• Certainty (up to 5 years, plus a 4-year rollback)
• Reduced litigation
• Elimination of double taxation (in bilateral APAs)

Types

• Unilateral APA — faster, India-only certainty
• Bilateral APA — full protection from double taxation

Documentation: non-negotiable

Penalties

• Section 271AA: 2% of transaction value (no documentation)
• Section 271G: 2% (failure to furnish data)

Required documentation (Rule 10D)

• Group and entity overview
• Functional analysis (FAR)
• Comparability study
• Method selection and justification
• Pricing computation

Quality matters more than volume. Boilerplate documentation fails audits.

Secondary adjustment risk

Under Section 92CE, if a TP adjustment occurs:

• The excess amount is treated as a loan to the foreign AE
• Notional interest is charged if it is not repatriated

This creates ongoing financial impact, not just a one-time tax cost.

Practical action plan (FY 2026–27)

• Review inter-company agreements
• Conduct functional analysis
• Benchmark margins
• File Form 3CEB on time
• Evaluate safe harbour eligibility
• Consider an APA for large transactions
• Assess secondary adjustment exposure

Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP)

Used to resolve double taxation:

• Involves treaty partner countries
• Increasingly efficient post-BEPS
• Applicable for major jurisdictions (US, UK, Japan, Germany and others)

The IPRS perspective

Transfer pricing is not just compliance — it is strategic.

Businesses that manage TP well:

• Maintain updated agreements
• Perform proactive benchmarking
• Involve leadership (CFO and Board)

Businesses that do not:

• Face higher adjustments
• Experience prolonged litigation
• Suffer double taxation

Conclusion

India's TP environment today is more data-driven, more scrutinised and more consequential.

At the same time, tools such as APAs, MAP, safe harbours and robust documentation offer strong protection — if used proactively.

The gap between proactive and reactive businesses has never been wider.

If you have not reviewed your transfer pricing policy in the last 12 months, now is the time.